Evolve, LLC — Free Visibility Audit
Ianniello Chauvin, LLP — Saratoga Springs, NY
Here’s where Ianniello Chauvin stands in the Saratoga Springs legal market across Criminal Defense, Personal Injury, and Business/Corporate Law. Every number below is pulled from live data — Google Maps, geographic ranking scans, citation directories, and legal authority directory verification.
Your Visibility Audit
21/70
Your firm has real legal talent — 4 attorneys, former prosecutors, 100+ years combined experience, and a well-built website with dedicated pages for every practice area. But the digital presence hasn’t caught up to the caliber of the firm. With only 7 Google reviews, no presence on any of the legal authority directories that feed Google’s legal search results, and zero top-3 map rankings across all three practice areas, the vast majority of people searching for attorneys in Saratoga Springs never see your name.
Score Breakdown
Seven dimensions, each scored 0–10 from live data. These aren’t opinions — every score has a specific data point behind it.
| Dimension | Score | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Google Maps Presence | 4/10 | Perfect 5.0-star rating, but only 7 reviews — well below the 20-review threshold Google treats as credible. GBP is claimed with a specific “Personal injury attorney” category. |
| Map Visibility | 2/10 | 0% top-3 presence across all three practice areas (Criminal Defense: 0%, Personal Injury: 0%, Business/Corporate: 0%). You appear in the top 10 for criminal defense and PI, but you’re in the top 3 nowhere. |
| Review Authority | 3/10 | Your 5.0 rating technically leads DeLuca’s 4.9, but 7 reviews vs. 297 is a 42× deficit. One negative review drops you below every competitor instantly. The rating lead is real but statistically fragile. |
| Content & GEO Readiness | 6/10 | Strong on-site foundation: 8 dedicated practice area pages, 4 attorney bios, FAQ section, blog, 4 location pages, and Attorney/LegalService/LocalBusiness/Organization schema. Missing FAQPage and Service schema. Citation presence is thin — only 3 of 20 directories have correct NAP. |
| Competitive Position | 1/10 | Your firm doesn’t hold the #1 map position on any of the 95 scanned pins in any practice area — 0% across all three grids. DeLuca holds #1 on 100% of criminal defense pins and 95% of business law pins. Harding Mazzotti holds #1 on 100% of personal injury pins. |
| Review Velocity | 1/10 | 7 total reviews vs. DeLuca’s 297 (42×), Harding Mazzotti’s 603 (86×), and Garofalo’s 177 (25×). Even the lowest-reviewed competitor in the criminal defense grid — Kurt Mausert — has 53 reviews, 7.5× more. |
| Topical Authority Coverage | 4/10 | Hub pages exist for all 8 practice areas — strong breadth. But almost no sub-practice depth: one page for criminal defense vs. DeLuca’s 8 sub-pages (DWI, assault, drug crimes, domestic violence, felonies, AUO, larceny). Personal injury has one page with no sub-practice breakouts (car accidents, truck accidents, slip-and-fall, wrongful death). Blog and FAQ exist but haven’t built topical clusters. |
Where You Rank Across Saratoga Springs
You selected three practice areas. Below is a live 11×11 grid scan of Google Maps rankings around your office for each one — 95 pins per grid. The picture is very different depending on which area you’re looking at.
How Each Practice Area Ranks
Three separate map scans — one per practice area you selected. Green = top 3. Yellow = top 10. Red = not ranking.
Criminal Defense / DUI
0% at #1 · 0% in top 3 · 0% invisible
You’re in the top 10 on every pin (average position 5.6), but never in the top 3. DeLuca holds #1 on all 95 pins — a total lockout.
Personal Injury
0% at #1 · 0% in top 3 · 0% invisible
In the top 10 everywhere but clustered around positions 8–9 (average 7.9). Harding Mazzotti (603 reviews, 4.9 stars) owns #1 on every pin.
The contrast across these three grids tells the story. Criminal defense is your strongest area — you show up in the top 10 everywhere, which means Google recognizes you in that space. But “top 10” means searchers have to scroll past 5+ other firms before they see you. Personal injury is weaker (average position 7.9), with Harding Mazzotti’s 603 reviews creating a wall you can’t get past at the current review count. Business/corporate law is a visibility crisis: 99% of the map grid doesn’t show your firm at all, despite the fact that you have three dedicated business law pages on your site. The gap between your on-site content quality and your map visibility is the central finding of this audit — the website is built to compete, but the signals Google uses to rank (reviews, citations, directory authority) haven’t followed.
3 Critical Gaps Holding You Back
1. Only 7 Google Reviews in a Market Where 100+ Is the Minimum
Your firm has a perfect 5.0-star rating — but it’s built on just 7 reviews. Every major competitor in your three practice areas has at least 14× more: DeLuca has 297, Harding Mazzotti has 603, Garofalo has 177, Amedio has 100, DeMartino has 99. Google treats review count and review velocity as primary ranking signals. A 5-star rating on 7 reviews carries less algorithmic weight than a 4.9 on 297.
Business impact: Your perfect rating is invisible because Google doesn’t trust the sample size. Every “criminal defense attorney Saratoga Springs” or “personal injury lawyer near me” search ranks firms with more reviews higher — and right now, that’s everyone except you.
2. Missing From All 7 Legal Authority Directories
We searched Avvo, Justia, FindLaw, Lawyers.com, Martindale-Hubbell, NACDL, and 1800Injured for your firm. No profile on any of them. These aren’t generic business directories — they’re the specific sources Google and AI Overviews cite when people ask legal questions. When someone asks “Who’s the best criminal defense attorney in Saratoga Springs?” to Google or ChatGPT, these directories are where the answers come from.
Business impact: You’re absent from the legal ecosystem that feeds AI-driven search results. Every competitor with an Avvo profile, a Justia listing, or a Martindale-Hubbell rating has a presence in channels your firm doesn’t even appear in.
3. Business/Corporate Law: 99% Invisible on the Map
Your firm has three dedicated pages for business law (Commercial Law, Business Transactions, Commercial Real Estate) — solid content. But on the Google Maps grid for business/corporate law queries, you don’t appear in the top 20 on 99% of the 95 scanned pins. You rank 13th on exactly 1 pin and don’t rank at all on the other 94. Meanwhile, DeLuca — a firm whose primary category is “Criminal justice attorney” — holds #1 on 90 of those 95 pins purely on the strength of reviews and general authority.
Business impact: Businesses searching for corporate counsel, commercial real estate attorneys, or contract help in Saratoga Springs will never find you via Google Maps. Every one of those searches goes to a competitor — including competitors who don’t even specialize in business law.
Competitive Snapshot
Your firm vs. the top 3 competitors from the criminal defense map grid (your strongest practice area).
| Firm | Rating | Reviews | Avg Rank | #1 Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ianniello Chauvin, LLP | 5.0 ★ | 7 | 5.6 | 0 / 95 |
| The Law Office of Andrew DeLuca | 4.9 ★ | 297 | ~1.0 | 95 / 95 |
| Law Office of Gregory P. Garofalo | 4.9 ★ | 177 | — | 0 / 95 |
| The Law Offices of Gerard V. Amedio | 4.9 ★ | 100 | — | 0 / 95 |
Map data from the Criminal Defense / DUI grid scan. DeLuca also dominates Business/Corporate Law (90 of 95 #1 wins). Harding Mazzotti (4.9 ★, 603 reviews) dominates the Personal Injury grid at 95/95 #1 wins.
Citation & Directory Breakdown
| Directories scanned | 20 |
| Listings found | 7 of 20 |
| Correct NAP (name, address, phone) | 3 of 7 |
Your firm is missing from 13 of 20 directories scanned — including Bing, Yellow Pages, and Foursquare. Of the 7 that do list you, only 3 have fully correct information (ShowMeLocal, Find-Open, WhereTo). Your Yelp listing has a name mismatch that should be corrected. Google treats directory consistency as a trust signal for local pack rankings: the fewer directories that confirm your business exists with correct info, the less confident Google is about showing you to searchers.
Legal Authority Directory Presence
Generic citation directories (the ones in the section above) matter for Google Maps trust. Legal-specific authority directories matter for how Google ranks law firms in legal SERPs and how AI Overviews pick which firms to cite. We checked each of the directories that feed those rankings:
Verification Summary — 0 of 7 legal directories list your firm
| Directory | Status | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| Avvo | NOT FOUND | First-stop directory for legal AI Overviews; ratings shown directly in Google legal SERPs |
| Justia | NOT FOUND | Free high-authority profile; strongly indexed by Google for attorney-name queries |
| FindLaw | NOT FOUND | Thomson Reuters legal network; long-standing trust signal for legal SERPs |
| Lawyers.com | NOT FOUND | Martindale-Hubbell consumer-facing portal; common comparison shopping destination |
| Martindale-Hubbell | NOT FOUND | Peer ratings; AV Preeminent badge is one of the strongest legal credibility signals |
| NACDL | NOT FOUND | National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers membership — peer-credential signal for criminal defense |
| 1800Injured | NOT FOUND | Personal injury referral network; feeds Google’s legal-vertical results for PI queries |
Zero of 7. This is the single biggest structural gap in your digital presence. Every one of these directories is free to join. Avvo and Justia profiles take 15–20 minutes each to create, and both are among the first sources Google cites in AI Overviews for legal queries in Saratoga Springs. When someone asks Google “Who’s the best criminal defense attorney near Saratoga Springs?” — the answer pulls from these directories. Your firm is not in the pool of possible answers. Competitors with profiles are. This is fixable this week.
Accessibility & ADA Readiness
97/100 mobile · 100/100 desktop — your site already passes most automated accessibility checks — strong foundation
A Medium audit ($49) runs the full WCAG-aligned audit and names the top 3 specific fixes. ADA accessibility lawsuits against local businesses are rising every year — this is one of the highest-leverage protections you can put in place.
3 Quick Wins You Can Execute This Week
1. Create Free Profiles on Avvo and Justia — Today
Both are free. Both take 15–20 minutes. Both are the two directories Google’s AI Overviews cite most frequently for legal queries. Go to avvo.com/free-profile and justia.com/marketing/claim-your-profile, claim your firm and individual attorney profiles, and fill in every field: practice areas, bar admissions, office locations, and a firm description. Your competitors with Avvo profiles already have a signal you don’t. None of the 5 competitors in your criminal defense grid have FAQPage schema or strong directory coverage — being first to Avvo and Justia gives you a real edge.
2. Launch a Review Request Campaign — Target 30 Reviews in 90 Days
Text or email every client who’s had a positive outcome in the last 12–24 months with a direct link to your Google review page. Your 7 reviews are not a foundation — they’re a placeholder. DeLuca has 297, Harding Mazzotti has 603. You don’t need to match them overnight, but you need to get to 40+ within 3 months to start registering as a credible option in Google’s local pack. A simple post-resolution text — “It was a privilege to represent you. If you’d share your experience on Google, it helps other people in similar situations find good counsel” — sent within 48 hours of case resolution, consistently, is the fastest path.
3. Add FAQPage Schema to Your Existing FAQ Content
Your homepage already has 6 FAQ questions with substantive answers — strong content that Google currently can’t read as structured FAQ data. Adding FAQPage schema (a 30-minute technical task for your web developer) wraps that content in the format Google uses for “People Also Ask” features and AI Overview answers. Here’s the leverage: we checked all 5 of your top competitors’ schema — DeLuca, Garofalo, Amedio, Mausert, DeMartino — and none of them have FAQPage schema either. First mover wins the FAQ rich results for Saratoga Springs legal queries.
What a Full Audit Reveals
This snapshot covers where you stand right now. A full engagement goes deeper — mapping the specific keywords your competitors rank for that you don’t, running a complete on-page technical SEO audit of your site’s title tags and content depth against page-1 competitors, auditing your schema markup against the full legal-vertical rubric (Attorney, LegalService, FAQPage, AggregateRating, Service), producing a WCAG-aligned accessibility audit with a prioritized fix list, building a 30/60/90-day strategic roadmap with specific actions and owners, and creating a 12-month content calendar mapped to the search queries real clients use when they need a criminal defense attorney, personal injury lawyer, or business counsel in the Capital Region.
Want to Turn These Gaps Into Growth?
This snapshot only scratches the surface. Book a free strategy call with Jim at Evolve — we’ll walk through your numbers, answer your questions, and map out exactly what it takes to start winning in your market.
Book Your Free Strategy Call →
No pressure. No pitch deck. Just a straight conversation about where you stand and what’s possible.
Analysis prepared using live Google Maps data, geographic ranking scans, citation directory audits, legal authority directory verification, and competitive research. Generated May 2026.